 |
 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear Developers, I have already assigned many of the NHs (initially anonymous) and I saw the corresponding 13C peaks (anonymous but connected i and i-1) in the various triple resonance experiments getting the appropiate assignement from the sequence and the i and i-1 connectivity information already present. I did it in 1.0.8. Now after a hiatus, I am opening the project in 1.0.9 with all the latest updates and find that many of these 13C peaks still have the old 'anonymous' spin system numbers instead of the residue name and number. I don't think its a problem with 1.0.9 as it was apparently good in v 1.0.9, though I can't be sure. It could be caused by a recent update? I am able to make analysis assign the proper residue name by doing R:Assign:Set sequential spin system:... or similar. I don't want to go through the whole procedure manually and unnecessarily! Could you please help to find out what could be causing this? Corrupted files? - I don't think so as I have used two different copies of the project and still get the same result. Many thanks. Best, Murali. Begin forwarded message: > From: Murali Vadivelu <[log in to unmask]> > Date: 14 February 2006 05:48:40 pm GMT > To: CcpNmr software mailing list <[log in to unmask]> > Subject: Fwd: Sorting > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > It seems to be not an issue with the sorting. For some reason, some > peaks remain unassigned. Say for example, I have most of my NH > peaks assigned. Corresponding 13C peaks from the triple resonance > experiments are already connected (i and i-1). This should cause > the assignment to spread automatically and it looked it did, I did > it in release 8 and using 9 now! > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: Murali Vadivelu <[log in to unmask]> >> Date: 14 February 2006 05:21:20 pm GMT >> To: [log in to unmask] >> Subject: Sorting >> Reply-To: CcpNmr software mailing list <[log in to unmask]> >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Sorting in Edit Peak List is sorting according to the 'position >> number' of the assigned residue in HNCA while its including the >> alphabets in HNCO. The earlier is preferred way of sorting or >> there could be an option to choose! Is this a bug? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFD8jyXm7hHUYJtaG4RApLMAJ9xPttnQN9Lai/b2Yv4V9BfDxeVxwCgiCeW ZIgYyHwP+Dcm0CREvat9qfo= =PIne -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----