 |
 |
As someone who felt that they SHOULD be reading NS I decided to get a subscription last Xmas. I have decided not to renew it as I found that most of the front page articles would draw ones attention to an article that then admitted that the supposed 'breakthrough' was an untested theory by someone who most scientists felt was wrong. I was left unsure as to what audience NS was aimed at. Apart form the last two pagees, Feedback and `The Last Word, I rarely foind that it took 10 minutes to read everything that interested me. On balance I felt it was of no use to me. This year I have taken out an online subscription to Scientific American. -- "Science was his forte, OmniScience his foible" Sydney Smith of William Whewell Bryson Gore 24 Lawn Rd London NW3 2XR Phone: 020 7691 0477 Mobile: 07968 248 573 [log in to unmask] <http:www.omniscience.info> ********************************************************************** 1. To suspend yourself from the list, whilst on leave, for example, send an email to [log in to unmask] with the following message: set psci-com nomail 2. To resume email from the list, send the following message: set psci-com mail 3. To leave psci-com, send an email to [log in to unmask] with the message: leave psci-com 4. Further information about the psci-com discussion list, including list archive, can be found at the list web site: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/psci-com.html 5. The psci-com gateway to internet resources on science communication and science and society can be found at http://psci-com.ac.uk **********************************************************************