This important paper will be of interest to many list members.
Jane Sandall
Fetal Pulse Oximetry and Cesarean Delivery
N Engl J Med 2006;355:2195-202 and see important commentary in same journal
Obstetricians Still Await a Deus ex Machina
BACKGROUND
Knowledge of fetal oxygen saturation, as an adjunct to electronic fetal monitoring,
may be associated with a significant change in the rate of cesarean deliveries or the
infant’s condition at birth.
METHODS
We randomly assigned 5341 nulliparous women who were at term and in early labor
to either “open” or “masked” fetal pulse oximetry. In the open group, fetal oxygen
saturation values were displayed to the clinician. In the masked group, the fetal
oxygen sensor was inserted and the values were recorded by computer, but the data
were hidden. Labor complicated by a nonreassuring fetal heart rate before randomization
was documented for subsequent analysis.
RESULTS
There was no significant difference in the overall rates of cesarean delivery between
the open and masked groups (26.3% and 27.5%, respectively; P = 0.31). The rates of
cesarean delivery associated with the separate indications of a nonreassuring fetal
heart rate (7.1% and 7.9%, respectively; P = 0.30) and dystocia (18.6% and 19.2%,
respectively; P = 0.59) were similar between the two groups. Similar findings were
observed in the subgroup of 2168 women in whom a nonreassuring fetal heart rate
was detected before randomization. The condition of the infants at birth did not
differ significantly between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS
Knowledge of the fetal oxygen saturation is not associated with a reduction in the
rate of cesarean delivery or with improvement in the condition of the newborn.