Brew, CAJ (Chris) wrote: > So the question is how should this be handled? It seems like a no-brainer - use TMPDIR. It doesn't break anything, it's a well specified standard, and non-project apps are likely to use it anyway. Inventing yet-another definition -- or even setting up wrapper scripts -- when TMPDIR already exists, is used and is available seems pointless. I've already been asked in the past to define a variable with the path to a large (10GB+) scratch volume for an experiment, and TMPDIR was their existing preferred name. [Note, however, that experiments should use mktemp to carve their own namespace out of TMPDIR as it may or may not be shared with other users.] The only reason presented _not_ to use it is that PBS defines this variable to a PBS spool directory (for this exact intended purpose) which might cause some sites by surprise. This doesn't seem like a compelling reason to avoid it; sites can trivially redefine this variable if necesary. > It seems like the current LCG standard of setting EDG_WL_SCRATCH but not > TMPDIR is the worst of both worlds. EDG_WL_SCRATCH doesn't appear to be standard, or at least, not in very common use as my YAIM-generated WN environment doesn't define it. (According to that Savannah transcript, MPI jobs will break if it is defined with a path to a non-shared volume, as would be the case locally anyway.) No, unless there's a compelling reason that no-one's already mentioned, using TMPDIR seems like the only sensible way to proceed. Cheers, David -- David McBride <[log in to unmask]> Department of Computing, Imperial College, London