 |
 |
in addition to tarkovsky what about most of antonioni's films and haneke. >From: Jason Ulane <[log in to unmask]> >Reply-To: Film-Philosophy Salon <[log in to unmask]> >To: [log in to unmask] >Subject: Re: staying in time >Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:45:33 -0500 > >Pick any of Tarkovsky's films - in partic. Mirror, Stalker, Nostalghia and >The Sacrifice. > >Jansco's films also provide great examples. > >Jason >-----Original message----- >From: Melis Behlil [log in to unmask] >Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 03:45:21 -0500 >To: [log in to unmask] >Subject: Re: staying in time > >Bela Tarr's films, especially the beginning of Satantango. > >On 8/2/06, Adam Gregory <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > > a thread was recently started on 'jumps in time' which evoked a question > > from me: instances in film where there are no cuts or editing, as in >the > > scene is uninterrupted and appears to be captured in its 'true >duration', > > i find these to be remarkable if done well for many reasons. it seems >to > > be a way of rendering cinematic time elastic. i know of a few >instances, > > and the ones that stick out are the ones that were most jolting: > > Happiness had some moments that yawned, so did Vulgar, and temporality >was > > one of the subjects of Decasia. i was wondering if any of you had some > > more examples, aside from the list of 9 films mentioned earlier in > > the 'jumps in time' thread. it doesn't have to be films comprised of >one > > shot, but just perhaps some moments where the visuals slowed or froze to > > an almost awkward degree. thanks in advance. > > > > take care > > adam > > > > * > > * > > Film-Philosophy Email Discussion Salon. > > After hitting 'reply' please always delete the text of the message you >are > > replying to. > > To leave, send the message: leave film-philosophy to: > > [log in to unmask] > > For help email: [log in to unmask], not the salon. > > ** > > > >* >* >Film-Philosophy Email Discussion Salon. >After hitting 'reply' please always delete the text of the message you are >replying to. >To leave, send the message: leave film-philosophy to: >[log in to unmask] >For help email: [log in to unmask], not the salon. >** > >* >* >Film-Philosophy Email Discussion Salon. >After hitting 'reply' please always delete the text of the message you are >replying to. >To leave, send the message: leave film-philosophy to: >[log in to unmask] >For help email: [log in to unmask], not the salon. >** * * Film-Philosophy Email Discussion Salon. After hitting 'reply' please always delete the text of the message you are replying to. To leave, send the message: leave film-philosophy to: [log in to unmask] For help email: [log in to unmask], not the salon. **