>and doesn't 'Annie Hall' count. good question . . . but maybe not, at least not if one is looking to characterize the rom-com genre at a particular time . . . i'm inclined to argue that woody is so sui-generis that, while he inescapably reflects the world in which he works, he reflects it in such idiosyncratic ways that a template of the cultural norm -- of the kind i think cary grant provides for 1940 and meg ryan provides for 1990 -- needs to come from elsewhere . . . then we can see how the exceptional woody allen stuff maps onto the general plan but maybe i'm wrong about this mike . . . . . . . . * * Film-Philosophy Email Discussion Salon. After hitting 'reply' please always delete the text of the message you are replying to. To leave, send the message: leave film-philosophy to: [log in to unmask] For help email: [log in to unmask], not the salon. **