Print

Print


I have twice written proposals to the National Science Foundation for  
funds to hire a part-time graduate student to assemble an atlas of  
prehistoric and historic slags (most macroscopic and microstructural)  
on CD-ROM or DVD. Both times the idea has been shot down by reviewers  
(archaeologists), which goes to show that archaeometallurgy isn't  
even on the radar for most archaeologists in the USA.

I'm very glad to hear that Evelyne is able to start putting together  
an on-line atlas and will be glad to contribute materials for the  
slag and ore microscopy sections.  I would urge however that higher  
resolution micrographs be made available on CD-ROM / DVD, or else put  
in an archive from which they  can be downloaded by fttp.   The  
compromises adopted for reasonably fast web delivery of images in  
atlases of microstructures currently posted, such as the copper  
microstructures ( http://www.copper.org/resources/properties/ 
microstructure/homepage.html) or Rob Ixer's pioneering Atlas of  
Opague and Ore Minerals in their associations (http://www.smenet.org/ 
opaque-ore/) often make it hard to see exsolution laminae, eutectoid  
structures or the fine gradations in color typical of compositional  
zoning in crystals. This is the Achilles heel of web-hosted atlases  
of microstructures - note especially the Brtish Steel online altas of  
iron and steel microstructures at http://www2.umist.ac.uk/material/ 
research/intmic/mterials/britstel/britstel.htm#bainite.   
Unfortunately all the evident care that went into the construction of  
this site is negated by the fact that the micrographs are basically  
uninterpretable except by those who already have extensive knowledge  
of the relevant microstructures!

Dave Killick


On Apr 26, 2006, at 7:30 AM, James Brothers wrote:

> Any recommendations on good books/articles on slag analysis?  
> Another list I'm on is asking. I know of some, but I'm hoping that  
> there are some newer ones. Audience is archaeologists and  
> historians, not archaemetallurgists, chemists and physicists. So  
> they are probably more interested in basics rather than phase  
> diagrams. Although a few advanced references for the brave of heart  
> would be a good idea.
>
> thank
> James Brothers