medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and culture
DANIEL KLINE wrote:
> medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and culture
>
> While I understand VKE and FM's sentiment, isn't there some value in
> knowing the history of opinion and the development of scholarship of
> texts as important to the MAges as biblical texts? I've got an MDiv as
> well, and I find myself drawing on the textual scholarship of the OT
> and NT all the time--if not simply for the history of opinion but for
> how the questions have been formulated and, perhaps more importantly,
> what questions have been ignored or not asked. If nothing else, that
> knowledge has helped me work through a number of interesting class
> sessions here in the US, where a specific interpretation of the Bible
> has important social and political implications these days. Or maybe
> I'm just stating the obvious . . . ?
>
> If memory serves, isn't much of Jude quoted in some form in 2 Peter?
>
> Best from Anchorage,
>
> Dan
Luther thought it was the other way round, and rejected Jude as a result.
Gordon
-------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Gordon Arthur | Orthodoxy is my doxy; heterodoxy is
[log in to unmask] | another man's doxy. (Bishop Warburton)
-------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.ecumenist.org/
-------------------------------------------------------------
**********************************************************************
To join the list, send the message: join medieval-religion YOUR NAME
to: [log in to unmask]
To send a message to the list, address it to:
[log in to unmask]
To leave the list, send the message: leave medieval-religion
to: [log in to unmask]
In order to report problems or to contact the list's owners, write to:
[log in to unmask]
For further information, visit our web site:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/medieval-religion.html
