 |
 |
>. . . which fits I think with your later posting that essentially asks >what, after all the words, we intend to DO (and with which I heartily >agree). > >- Peter Let me check this with you. This is not what I am asking. I assume I know what we intend to do - be gratified and lead a good and fulfilling quality of life for ourselves To verify this I ask any of you if you wish to be and enjoy being miserable, unfulfilled and constantly abused, laughed at, humilated, dehumanised? My question is - What we intend to do about it? Presently, with future in mind and embodying the past. My response is, for me, completing this public and promptly communicating of my proposed heuristics. This is what my work all about. Alon On Mon, 1 Aug 2005 09:42:15 +0100, Peter Mellett <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >Alon - >Your quote from Laing > >> if this I that is the wherewith and whereby is not anything that I know, >> then it is no thing - nothing. > >reminds me of e e cummings: > >when god decided to invent >everything he took one >breath bigger than a circustent >and everything began > >when man determined to destroy >himself he picked the was >of shall and finding only why >smashed it into because > >. . . which fits I think with your later posting that essentially asks >what, after all the words, we intend to DO (and with which I heartily >agree). > >- Peter > > >=========================================================================