 |
 |
Another matter/rationale is the ontology of enabling individual- Who is the enabling individual? Shouldn't the enabling understand and study/develop himself/herself prior to enabling? Isn't an enabling individum who studies and looks at himself/herself more suitable to enable his/her neighbour? An ability to take a look at oneself is also a talent and an important one for social development and humanity. And a very difficult and courageous. Alon On Mon, 1 Aug 2005 11:29:12 +0100, Chris Keeble <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >.. perhaps using your talent to enable your 'neighbour' achieve their >flourishing; since we are 'beings-in-relationship' rather than isolated >items. involving suffering (in the sense to bear: to endure) which would be >inevitable; without it humanity may well have destroyed itself long ago? xc > > > >Chris Keeble Limited > >The Jacobean House > >Pinewoods > >Longworth > >Oxford > >OX13 5HH > >Land: +44 (0)1865821000 > >Mobile: +44(0)7703 343536 > >VOIP: +44(0)8700683887 > >[log in to unmask] > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: BERA Practitioner-Researcher >[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Alon >Serper >Sent: 01 August 2005 10:25 >To: [log in to unmask] >Subject: Re: relevant laing on scientific evaluation > > > >To verify this I ask any of you if you wish to be and enjoy being miserable, > >unfulfilled and constantly abused, laughed at, humilated, dehumanised? > > > > > >