Print

Print


Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
From: Torsten Harenberg <[log in to unmask]>
Sender: LHC Computer Grid - Rollout <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: LHC Computer Grid - Rollout <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [LCG-ROLLOUT] several problems after update
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:46:43 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
in-reply-to: <[log in to unmask]>
x-cclrc-spam-report: <[log in to unmask]>
x-scanned-by: <[log in to unmask]>
x-ral-mfrom: <[log in to unmask]>
x-ral-connect: <[log in to unmask]>
x-x-sender: <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain

On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 [log in to unmask] wrote:

> On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, Torsten Harenberg wrote:
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > we're facing several problems after updating to LCG-2_3_0.
> >
> > First, the GIIS monitors shows entries like this:
> >
> > dn: GlueSARoot=ghep:ghep,GlueSEUniqueID=grid-se.physik.uni-wuppertal.de,
> > Mds-Vo-name=wuppertalprod,mds-vo-name=local,o=grid
> > ldap_add: Invalid syntax
> >         additional info: GlueSAStateAvailableSpace: value #0 invalid per
> > syntax
> > ldif_record() = 21
> >
> > I found an old mail suggesting that this is a wrong installation date,
but
> > this seems not to be the case here. Any ideas?
> >
> > 2nd: I have wrong entries in the GIIS like this:
> >
> > IN: dn:
> > GlueSARoot=atlas:atlas,GlueSEUniqueID=grid-se.physik.uni-wuppertal.de,
> > Mds-Vo-name=wuppertalprod,o=grid
> >         "GlueSAStateAvailableSpace:"
> >
> > Which are only appearing after a while. When the SE is bootet, the
values
> > are okay, but "disappearing" some time after.
> >
> > Hope somebody has an idea on one of the issues mentioned.
>
> The issues are the same: the GRIS does not define
GlueSAStateAvailableSpace.
>
> At least a line like this is missing in
/opt/lcg/var/lcg-info-generic.conf:
>
> temp_path=/opt/lcg/var/gip/tmp
>
> Whatever directory you put there, ensure it is writable for "edginfo".
>

Thanks Maarten, you're (again) right, a line like this is indeed missing.

As we've a LCFGng based installation: do you have any idea why this was is
wrong there? I'll add the line now "by hand", but I assume that this will
be sooner or later overwritten by LCFG....

Thanks again for your help,

  Torsten

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
<>                                                              <>
<> Torsten Harenberg         [log in to unmask]  <>
<> Bergische Universitaet                                       <>
<> FB C - Physik             Tel.: +49 (0)202 439-3521          <>
<> Gaussstr. 20              Fax : +49 (0)202 439-2811          <>
<> 42097 Wuppertal                                              <>
<>                                                              <>
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>