Charles,
Thanks for the quick comments. Can you supply URLs to the appropriate documents?
Cheers,
Eric
> Eric Childress
> Consulting Project Manager
> OCLC Research {http://www.oclc.org/research}
> OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc.
> 6565 Frantz Rd., Dublin, OH 43017 USA
> US: (800) 848-5878 or (614) 764-6000
> Fax: (614) 718-7361 email: [log in to unmask]
>
>
>
-----Original Message-----
From: Charles McCathieNevile [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 11:00 AM
To: Childress,Eric
Cc: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: DCMI Date WG workplan 2004/2005 -- proposed
Hi All,
this looks like a good plan to me.
I think that it would be nice to include in this looking at RDF and XML
schema datatypes for dates, which extend somewhat the possible range (e.g.
they do allow for B.C.E dates), but which are also partially related to usage
in particular syntax rather than the general schemes.
I guess these will in any case come up through the course of the relevant
dicsussions, so there may be no need to explicitly note them in the workplan.
On another note, I will be leaving W3C at the end of January (which means I
can no longer submit a team Note - no great loss really). I will change my
email details when I have clarified them :-)
cheers
Chaals
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Childress,Eric wrote:
>Greetings and a Happy New Year to all.
>
>To move us back to active mode, in this message I propose the text of a new
>workplan for 2004/2005. I suggest we allot through end of day 2005-01-10
>for discussion, and within a few days of the 10th I'll plan to issue a final
>verison of the plan, and will then work to update the DCMI Date WG web page.
