Print

Print


Dear Dr Wigen:  I personally am interested in any references with a method of recovery included elsewhere in the same report, from anywhere in the world.  I have a vague memeory of fragmentary urchins from a Phoenecian colony in Spain (Cadiz, perhaps?) which I would like help in tracking down.  There are also some whispers of urchins in Jomon mounds, so help from researchers working in or around Japanese material would also be great.
 
Species/wieghts reports are fine for now, and likely to be all there is in most cases.  Since urchin tests are not solid but made up of plates, they fragment into pieces typically less than 6mm (1/4 inch).  Since there has been little chance of identifying such fragments reliably, or using them to reconstruct urchin sizes, until now, weight and species data would be all that could be in the literature.  Species i.d. may be questionable, since it may be based on direct analogy with modern species in the vicinity, and it is often impossible to get to species within a genus; genera and species within genera have different sea temperature tolerances, so the ranges of species will not be the same through a given interglacial stage.  This is the case in the North Atlantic. 
 
I am especially interested in the Pacific northwest; there is a sequence of different dominant urchins as one proceeds southwards from Alaska to warmer waters, but these overlap in southern BC and Washington state and are mostly species in a single genus, Stronglyocentrotus.  My 'next big thing' is to refine my method to get to species within this genus, so fine-sieved material from along this coast (and help from a friendly local marine biologist) would be hugely helpful.
 
The eminent professor of sea urchinology would probably prefer a more general summary text, and similar ethnography.  But for me, any info will be gratefully received.
----- Original Message -----
From: [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">Rebecca Wigen
To: [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">Greg Campbell ; [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 4:27 PM
Subject: Re: [ZOOARCH] sea urchin references

Hi Greg
    Are you interested in NW coast information?  There is ethnographic info as well as some archaeological information.  The archaeological information is pretty much just weight and species data.
    Becky Wigen
Senior Lab Instructor,
Dept. of Anthropology,
University of Victoria
Victoria, BC Canada
----- Original Message -----
From: [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">Greg Campbell
To: [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 7:40 AM
Subject: [ZOOARCH] sea urchin references

Dear Zooarchers:  A couple of years ago I posted a request for some info on sea urchin remains in archaeology, having been landed with a sackful by an Oxford professor from his Breton site who expected me to know all about them because they were shells... Many of you were kind enough to offer suggestions and lines of inquiry.  The problem of minimum numbers of individuals, size range collected, species identification, and point on the shore exploited were all solved even though the tests were all very fragmentary.  Results coming out soon.  Must sieve to at least 2mm to get results that will allow size reconstruction and hence shore position!
 
Now one of the great men of sea urchin studies has asked for info about sea urchins used for food (tests and not just loose spines), and I would dearly appreciate any published references or forthcoming results for my own uses.  Prehistoric especially, but I seem to remember some remains from dark age Scottish Isles.
 
Many thanks.
Greg Campbell