Print

Print


Dear Jerry

I agree with this line of thinking entirely. This is why I changed the 
name of my course from "Design Methods (Theory and Practice) to "Design 
Concepts and Concerns", the intention of the designer and (their client 
and stake holders) the belief system that informs them and their 
openness to feedback is central to effective design. Design itself is a 
meandering process, impossible to predict (unknowable - thank you 
Jonas) and satisfying when it succeeds, in each particular instance.

Design is also a "reflexive process" since it is effected in a 
populated space that affects others (other humans, competition, other 
beliefs or dogma of truths held by history etc.) who will in turn 
respond to any offering with their own response in both time and space, 
which makes it all the more complex and at times controversial, 
especially in projects of public good and macro-economic ventures that 
include social change, like using public transport instead of private 
cars. Design advocacy may include systems offerings that are not 
products but suggested behavior change in the users, which make it 
political as well. Making new laws is a great design  act by this line 
of thinking, and our Supreme Court has been very effective in this area 
where our democratic legislative processes seem to have failed, for 
example ban on felling forests to stop the destruction of bio-diversity 
in the Himalayan region of India. My own work on bamboo as an economic 
driver for development in India touches on some of these economic and 
socio-political aspects and they are an integral part of our frame of 
reference.

Thank you for the link to your website and your tool (see link below)  
"Designer PiE2K: Ways of Thinking About Design" which is quite 
fascinating and deep. I have downloaded the application to my Mac at 
home and office, but do you have a windows version (or a pdf file that 
I can recommend) , most of my students use windows at our school.....
<http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~diethelm/next3.html>

With warm regards

M P Ranjan
from my office at NID
16 August 2005 at 1.30 pm IST

___________________________________________________________________

Prof M P Ranjan
Faculty of Design
Head, NID Centre for Bamboo Initiatives
Faculty Member on NID Governing Council (2003 -2005)
National Institute of Design
Paldi
Ahmedabad 380 007 INDIA

Tel: 91+79+26610054 (Res)
Tel: 91+79+26639692 ext 1090 (Off)
Tel: 91+79+26639692 ext 4095 (Off)
Fax: 91+79+26605242

email: <[log in to unmask]
web archive: <http://homepage.mac.com/ranjanmp/>
__________________________________________________________________


On 16-Aug-05, at 12:31 AM, Jerome Diethelm wrote:

> Proposals in design processes of any complexity are quite naturally 
> and regularly subjected to evaluation against the forces that are 
> driving the process, whatever we call them - needs, interests, 
> concerns, desires, fears, beliefs – as the process unfolds.