 |
 |
Terry, What a great vitae! But I would like to debate a point you made. On 2/26/05 11:14 AM, "Terence Love" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > The body-based craft skills don't smoothly transform to design skills. > They are functionally different. My view is that these both involve processes that become represented in the mind as neural structures. As information embodied in neural networks thay need not be forever or exclusively tied to the bodily movements or the specific design situation in which they were or might be activated. Such mental models of processes can be mapped onto one another, as for example, when one mentally simulates climbing a wall in order to design where footholds should go. Watching a six year old jump around as he describes the movement of his action hero also suggests strong linkages between what the body does and what the mind imagines can be done. Hand skills probably don't transfer directly to mind skills until they have been translated into a mental model that can be reinterpreted in another context. What do you think? Also given the amazing range of your practical experience aren't there many instances where you were guided during design by a process model based on prior physical experience? I know my experiences building things has shaped the way I think about design details and how the things I design get put together. Sir Christopher Frayling at the RCA (quoting Henry Cole I think) said "design is a matter of the hand, the heart, and the head." I think they got it right and our job is to find out how to integrate information from these sources (and the environment) even as we differentiate what they involve. Best, Chuck