 |
 |
Below is my original complaint, the BBC reply and my latest correspondence. Neil RE: 12147940 BBC News Dear Stewart McCullough, Thankyou for your reply. You state, 'Towards the end of the report footage of British soldiers under attack > in > Basra was shown. As you know the soldiers are reported to have come > under > attack after the storming of a Basra police station by British troops > sparked unrest in the area. James did not suggest this attack was > being > linked to Iran rather it was used to highlight the apparent increase in > tension in the area. The commentary which accompanied it made this > clear > as he pointed out that 'Britain has had a grim few months in southern > Iraq…' > > The events surrounding this instance have been covered extensively and > viewers are likely to be familiar with the details at this stage. In > addition the start of the report made it evident which kind of attacks > were > being linked to Iran by Britain - namely roadside attacks on armoured > vehicles using armour piercing weapons. ' I disagree on a number of points and believe one of your points, ie. that 'the soldiers are reported to have come under attack after the storming of a Basra police station by British troops sparked unrest in the area ' is misinformed. As far as I am aware, the unrest started after two Army personnel shot and killed local Iraqis. 'Britain has had a grim few months in southern Iraq…' If that was the only sentence to justify the inclusion of the tank being firebombed and the soldier emerging on fire - it doesn't actually make sense. The clip showed a recent attack by the British on local Iraqis - and, granted, it showed the local Iraqis briefly and violently gaining the upper hand in the British led attack. We both know the power of visuals - and in a report about alleged Iranian infiltration and direction of the insurgency, this visual was not neutral. And you are right - viewers would be familiar with this attack - but replaying PART of the British attack on a Basra locality is actually leading the news and not reporting it in a balanced way. If you think about it - showing BITS of the truth (that actually do not convey the outcome - that between 5-9 Iraqis were killed during the attack) along with only British and American comment, could be read as propaganda - a charge which the BBC, a neutral news agency, should be avoiding. Lastly, I repeat part of my original complaint that you have not replied to. You say that, 'It was made clear that the Government in Tehran has denied any involvement in these incidents.' Why was there no Iraqi vox pops? or Iranian? My original comment was: 'Secondly, for a 'balanced' news report not to have any Iranian commentary - or indeed any Iraqi or Middle Eastern voices - certainly was not what I expect from the BBC.' During the report, only British and American voices were heard. A comment from a British Army source and a comment from an American Army source. Neil Scott Glasgow Dear Mr Scott Thank you for your e-mail regarding BBC News 24 on 5 October. I am sorry to read that you were concerned by aspects of diplomatic correspondent James Robbins' report on recent events in Iraq. As you know the report was focusing on claims that Iran has been smuggling weaponry into Iraq. The report made clear that these were "accusations" by a senior British Official and the footage which accompanied the claims was of the scene of Major Matthew Bacon's death. His death, along with those of seven other British soldiers killed since May, was being linked directly to Iran and the footage was felt to be appropriate to illustrate the kind of attack which was being discussed. It was made clear that the Government in Tehran has denied any involvement in these incidents. Towards the end of the report footage of British soldiers under attack in Basra was shown. As you know the soldiers are reported to have come under attack after the storming of a Basra police station by British troops sparked unrest in the area. James did not suggest this attack was being linked to Iran rather it was used to highlight the apparent increase in tension in the area. The commentary which accompanied it made this clear as he pointed out that "Britain has had a grim few months in southern Iraq…" The events surrounding this instance have been covered extensively and viewers are likely to be familiar with the details at this stage. In addition the start of the report made it evident which kind of attacks were being linked to Iran by Britain - namely roadside attacks on armoured vehicles using armour piercing weapons. However, I am sorry if you were concerned and can assure you that your comments have been registered and added to our daily log which is made available to programme makers and senior editorial staff. Thank you again for contacting the BBC. Yours sincerely Stewart McCullough Divisional Advisor BBC Information Sir I would like to complain about coverage on the recent accusations of Iran's alleged involvement in the killing of British soldiers (in particular News 24; 9.00pm; October 5th). During the report, footage of the debacle surrounding the killing of between 5 and 9 Iraqi citizens by two British Special Forces agents was shown - in particular, the footage of the crowds petrol bombing tanks that had been sent in to Basra to attack the local jail. This 'illustration' to the commentary about the Iran allegations was certainly emotive, but at no time did the commentator say that the footage had nothing to do with these allegations and indeed did not show Iranians - and no mention was made to the circumstances surrounding the footage. Secondly, for a 'balanced' news report not to have any Iranian commentary - or indeed any Iraqi or Middle Eastern voices - certainly was not what I expect from the BBC. The only sources quoted where the British and American Armies. This is not what I expect from an impartial news service.