Hello Folks, Can you add a new site on the GOCDB? We have installed an itanium cluster. Here's the info: ****************************************************** The full name of the participating institute and site: Hewlett-Packard Puerto Rico The name of the site to be published in the information system: HPTC-LCG2ia64 The name, e-mail address and phone number of the site manager: Maniel Sotomayor: [log in to unmask]: +1 (787) 819 - 7673 Wilfredo Lugo: [log in to unmask]: +1 (787) 819 - 6182 [log in to unmask] The name, e-mail address and phone number of the site security contact: Wilfredo Lugo: [log in to unmask]: +1 (787) 819 - 6182 [log in to unmask] The e-mail address of a managed list to contact your incident response team: Wilfredo Lugo: [log in to unmask]: +1 (787) 819 - 6182 The name of your regional operations center HP **************************************************** Please, can we do that ? Thanks, ./MS -----Original Message----- From: Maarten Litmaath [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Sent: Tue 3/8/2005 9:36 AM To: Sotomayor, Maniel Cc: Andreas Unterkircher; [log in to unmask]; Lugo, Wilfredo E (R&D Puerto Rico); Navas, William J; Thorpe, MS (Matt); Kant, D (Dave) Subject: Re: [LCG-ROLLOUT] LCG2-IA64 at HPTC-LCG2 Sotomayor, Maniel wrote: > Hi again Maarten, > > OK, let's do the right thing. > > I was thinking of adding the suffix ia64 to our site name (ie HPTC-LCG2ia64). > The ldap base search name would be something like: > ldap://ice.prd.hp.com:2135 -b mds-vo-name=HPTC-LCG2ia64,o=grid OK. > You won't see the ia64 version because i changed the bdii config to eliminate the note. > > Do I have to request access to the GOCDB again for adding the new site ? > I still have the same cert. I suppose you would indeed repeat the procedure you followed for PRD and Brazil, i.e. request a new site to be added to the GOC DB, a site that happens to have the same admins as PRD itself. In any case HP-PRD is the ROC. Send your request to Matt Thorpe and/or Dave Kant (both in CC). > -----Original Message----- > From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] > Sent: Mon 3/7/2005 6:11 PM > To: Sotomayor, Maniel > Cc: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: [LCG-ROLLOUT] LCG2-IA64 at HPTC-LCG2 > > On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, Sotomayor, Maniel wrote: > > >>Good day Maarten, >> I noticed that after adding my second CE, the GIIS Monitor page = >>reports something like: >>dataGridVersion: CE-lcg20041217_1327_DecRel.txt **NOTE** old version = >>or does not use correct format: LCG-X_X_X > > > Hi Maniel, > a second CE must not act as a site GIIS, but in your case we then have > the problem that your site can not yet use a single "dataGridVersion" > for both CEs. We have these options: > > 1. Ignore the version mismatch for now and publish the IA-64 resources > along with the IA-32 resources (as a second CE and SE). > Since lcg20041217_1327_DecRel is fairly close to LCG-2_3_1 this may > not be such a bad idea. > > 2. The proper solution: publish the IA-64 site independently. > In that case, give us its site BDII address and the LDAP search base, > and we will add it to the all-sites zone. To have it picked up by the > daily tests, though, you must add it to the GOC DB as a separate site. > > This matter seems to show another limitation of the information system: > a different "dataGridVersion" for a CE requires a whole new site... > > >> I just did the upgrade to the 2.3.1 release, but the Version reported = >>is the one installed on my IA64 CE (ice) instead of the IA32 (ce) one. > > > I suppose you changed something, because I do not see that now. > > >> Also, I can see that a job list match failed on today tests. Is the = >>dataGridVersion value related to this problem ? > > > No, it would mean your site did not show up in the test zone BDII. > > >> Further, I don't see the queues hosted by ice being reported on the = >>GIIS Monitor web-page. I am missing something ? > > > Your site BDII is not publishing them. >