 |
 |
Hi, Antun Balaz wrote: >Hi, >it was announced that SFTs will be updated today. New version can already be >found at CVS > >http://isscvs.cern.ch:8180/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/sft2/?cvsroot=lcgware > >And of course, with CA rpms v. 0.31 sites will still pass the test... > >To avoid having CT, sites should wait with the upgrade of CA rpms until SFTs >are updated. Since you have already done it, you can just wait. > >It was discussed that maybe SFTs need to be changed (in order to avoid this >kind of problems) so that they ask for version >= of the current one. >Obviously it is not yet implemented... > > I need some time to implement this (using the method David Groep described some time ago on this same mailing list) - and to be honnest, to simplify the way this CA test is maintained. When it's ready, SFT should not complain anymore if a CA is detected but not recognized (I just need to make sure using the modulus would not allow having very old CAs also...) Cheers Fred >I am dealing with this problem launching SFTs from my site (using updated >source) after official tests, since I have also updated CA rpms yesterday, >after the announcement, to ensure that my site is OK: > >https://lcg-sft.cern.ch:9443/sft/sitehistory.cgi?site=ce.phy.bg.ac.yu > >Regards, Antun > >----- >E-mail: [log in to unmask] >Web: http://scl.phy.bg.ac.yu/ > >Phone: +381 11 3160260, Ext. 152 >Fax: +381 11 3162190 > >Scientific Computing Laboratory >Institute of Physics, Belgrade >Serbia and Montenegro >----- > > >---------- Original Message ----------- >From: Gonzalo Merino <[log in to unmask]> >To: [log in to unmask] >Sent: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 10:22:00 +0200 >Subject: Re: [LCG-ROLLOUT] Release of CA rpms (v0.32) > > > >>Hello, >> >>One of the sites we are hosting, apt-got the new CA v0.32 rpms >>tonight, and now is failing the SFT test with CT state: >> >> https://lcg-sft.cern.ch:9443/sft/sitehistory.cgi?site=ifaece01.pic.es >> >>This eventually will remove this site through the "Freedom of >>Choice" tool, etc. >> >>What is the situation concerning the SFT test for CA rpms today? v31 >>is ok and v32 is failed? Is this changing today? Then, once it >>changes, sites with v31 will immediate fail SFT with CT? >> >>Since it is impossible to synchronise the update of the SFT ca test >>with the upgrade at all sites, and the consequence of this seems to >>be CT failed, wouldn't be reasonable to allow at least some days (1 >>or 2) where sites that still have the old version of CA rpms are >>marked as NT, so that they are not removed automatically from the >>VOs lists? >> >>cheers, >>Gonzalo >> >>-- >>Gonzalo Merino ([log in to unmask]) >>Port d'Informació Científica, PIC >>Edifici-D, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona >>08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona) SPAIN >>Tel: +34 93 5813322 / Fax: +34 93 5814110 >> >>EGEE BROADCAST wrote: >> >> >>>------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> >----------- > > >>>Publication from : Ian Neilson <[log in to unmask]> (CERN) >>>This mail has been sent using the broadcasting tool available at >>> >>> >http://cic.in2p3.fr > > >>>------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> >----------- > > >>>EUGridPMA have announced a new set of CA rpms (v0.32). >>> >>>https://www.eugridpma.org/distribution/current/CHANGES >>> >>>Please upgrade as soon as you can. See the following page for more >>> >>> >details > > >>>http://grid-deployment.web.cern.ch/grid-deployment/lcg2CAlist.html >>> >>>In addition, please note that sites are discouraged from updating CA >>> >>> >rpms directly from the EUGridPMA repository. The EUGridPMA repository should >not be regarded as an operational service. Such an assumption may also >result in an overload of the repository server. > > >>>Site Functional Tests will be updated on Wednesday 7th Sept (tomorrow). >>> >>> >------- End of Original Message ------- > > >