 |
 |
Hi, it was announced that SFTs will be updated today. New version can already be found at CVS http://isscvs.cern.ch:8180/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/sft2/?cvsroot=lcgware And of course, with CA rpms v. 0.31 sites will still pass the test... To avoid having CT, sites should wait with the upgrade of CA rpms until SFTs are updated. Since you have already done it, you can just wait. It was discussed that maybe SFTs need to be changed (in order to avoid this kind of problems) so that they ask for version >= of the current one. Obviously it is not yet implemented... I am dealing with this problem launching SFTs from my site (using updated source) after official tests, since I have also updated CA rpms yesterday, after the announcement, to ensure that my site is OK: https://lcg-sft.cern.ch:9443/sft/sitehistory.cgi?site=ce.phy.bg.ac.yu Regards, Antun ----- E-mail: [log in to unmask] Web: http://scl.phy.bg.ac.yu/ Phone: +381 11 3160260, Ext. 152 Fax: +381 11 3162190 Scientific Computing Laboratory Institute of Physics, Belgrade Serbia and Montenegro ----- ---------- Original Message ----------- From: Gonzalo Merino <[log in to unmask]> To: [log in to unmask] Sent: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 10:22:00 +0200 Subject: Re: [LCG-ROLLOUT] Release of CA rpms (v0.32) > Hello, > > One of the sites we are hosting, apt-got the new CA v0.32 rpms > tonight, and now is failing the SFT test with CT state: > > https://lcg-sft.cern.ch:9443/sft/sitehistory.cgi?site=ifaece01.pic.es > > This eventually will remove this site through the "Freedom of > Choice" tool, etc. > > What is the situation concerning the SFT test for CA rpms today? v31 > is ok and v32 is failed? Is this changing today? Then, once it > changes, sites with v31 will immediate fail SFT with CT? > > Since it is impossible to synchronise the update of the SFT ca test > with the upgrade at all sites, and the consequence of this seems to > be CT failed, wouldn't be reasonable to allow at least some days (1 > or 2) where sites that still have the old version of CA rpms are > marked as NT, so that they are not removed automatically from the > VOs lists? > > cheers, > Gonzalo > > -- > Gonzalo Merino ([log in to unmask]) > Port d'Informació Científica, PIC > Edifici-D, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona > 08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona) SPAIN > Tel: +34 93 5813322 / Fax: +34 93 5814110 > > EGEE BROADCAST wrote: > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- > > Publication from : Ian Neilson <[log in to unmask]> (CERN) > > This mail has been sent using the broadcasting tool available at http://cic.in2p3.fr > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- > > > > EUGridPMA have announced a new set of CA rpms (v0.32). > > > > https://www.eugridpma.org/distribution/current/CHANGES > > > > Please upgrade as soon as you can. See the following page for more details > > > > http://grid-deployment.web.cern.ch/grid-deployment/lcg2CAlist.html > > > > In addition, please note that sites are discouraged from updating CA rpms directly from the EUGridPMA repository. The EUGridPMA repository should not be regarded as an operational service. Such an assumption may also result in an overload of the repository server. > > > > Site Functional Tests will be updated on Wednesday 7th Sept (tomorrow). ------- End of Original Message -------