 |
 |
I vote for SMELL ;) Burke, S (Stephen) wrote: > How about ELF - Enterprise Linux Family? ;) > S "what's all this html mail" B > > -----Original Message----- > *From:* LHC Computer Grid - Rollout > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On Behalf Of *Jeff Templon > *Sent:* 23 February 2005 12:59 > *To:* [log in to unmask] > *Subject:* Re: [LCG-ROLLOUT] OS tag proposal (was unambig CE tags) > > Hi, > > I think if people agree with the principle, we could even fill in > the values by hand if we like; we can get Fermi to fix their lsb > tool out of band. What should I start publishing: GEL? EL? ELC > (hey you hosers, take off eh?)? Or SMELL: > > Smell's Moreorless Enterprise Linux Like > > J "ouch that stunk" T > > On Feb 23, 2005, at 13:41, LEROY Christine DAPNIA wrote: > > Hi, > > > But with the Fermi SL the -i and -r option will not work : > > > [root@node05 rc3.d]# /usr/bin/lsb_release -a > > LSB Version: 1.3 > > *Distributor ID: n/a* > > Description: Scientific Linux SL Release 3.0.3 (SL) > > Release: n/a > > Codename: n/a > > > > > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : LHC Computer Grid - Rollout > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] De la part de Kostas > Koumantaros > Envoyé : mercredi 23 février 2005 13:39 > À : [log in to unmask] > Objet : Re: [LCG-ROLLOUT] OS tag proposal (was unambig CE tags) > > > Sound Great, > > and if We automate Dist ID and Release It would be perfect > > :) > > > Kostas > > > > Jeff Templon wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > the /usr/bin/lsb_release -i -r idea from Kostas seems to have > > > potential. The only thing that is missing is some generic > tag, since > > > SL and CentOS are really two derivatives of RHEL. Perhaps we > could do > > > the following: > > > > > > name: EL for enterprise Linux, RHC red hat classic numbering > scheme, > > > etc. > > > version: the "distributor ID" as provided by > /usr/bin/lsb_release -i > > > release: the release number as provided by > /usr/bin/lsb_release -i -r > > > > > > Here is the output I got from four systems, along with what > the Glue > > > Schema would contain if we go with the above proposal: > > > > > > lxplus.cern.ch > > > Distributor ID: ScientificCERN > > > Release: 3.0.3 > > > > > > Name: EL > > > Version: ScientificCERN > > > Release: 3.0.3 > > > ================================== > > > > > > tbn20.nikhef.nl (our new CE) > > > Distributor ID: CentOS > > > Release: 3.3 > > > > > > Name: EL > > > Version: CentOS > > > Release: 3.3 > > > =================================== > > > > > > juno.nikhef.nl (my desktop) > > > Distributor ID: RedHat > > > Release: 7.3 > > > > > > Name: RHC > > > Version: RedHat > > > Release: 7.3 > > > =================================== > > > > > > my laptop > > > dhcp-122:~ templon$ /usr/bin/lsb_release -i -r > > > -bash: /usr/bin/lsb_release: No such file or directory > > > > > > [ oh well ] > > > > > > dhcp-122:~ templon$ uname -a > > > Darwin dhcp-122.nikhef.nl 7.8.0 Darwin Kernel Version 7.8.0: > Wed Dec 22 > > > 14:26:17 PST 2004; root:xnu/xnu-517.11.1.obj~1/RELEASE_PPC > Power > > > Macintosh powerpc > > > > > > Name: BSD > > > Version: Apple > > > Release: 10.3.8 > > > > > > What do people think??? Thanks Kostas for an interesting idea. > > > > > > JT > > > > > > On Feb 23, 2005, at 12:36, Kostas Georgiou wrote: > > > > > >> $ /usr/bin/lsb_release -a > > >> LSB Version: 1.2.0 > > >> Distributor ID: RedHat > > >> Description: Red Hat Linux release 7.3 (Valhalla) > > >> Release: 7.3 > > >> Codename: Valhalla > > >> > > >> Kostas > > > >