 |
 |
Hi,
On Tue, 2005-01-18 at 11:56, Jules Wolfrat wrote:
> On the other hand the RLS is supposed to be very secure and protected
> against unwanted actions from users. The unwanted loss of physical files
> is more likely too happen.
But that's exactly the point we were trying to make: the RLS is *not*
secure and *not* protected against unwanted actions!
JT