 |
 |
Hi Laurence, Markus, et al, Laurence <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Hopefully next time we will be able to do this much faster. I think that for the size of your operational work it has been pretty good. All I want to say is that for the total size of the LCG grid, a 3 weeks' period might be an underestimated time window. Markus Schulz <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > In fact I am surprised because I observed the fact that the slope is > the same as we have seen in previous upgrades. [...] > No matter how hard you push, or how small the changes, you can't exceed > an average upgrade rate of 3 sites/day In fact, it might become as high as 4, or as low as 2 sites per day, but I doubt that an effort of this magnitude and complexity will finish that easily in an error-prone and decentralized way. I believe that for next time a target of 50% upgraded sites within 4 weeks, is quite more realistic. Targets are nice to have, when they are achievable :) -- echo "sysadmin know better bash than english" | sed s/min/mins/ \ | sed 's/better bash/bash better/' # Yelling in a CERN forum