 |
 |
I summarised the HEPiX batch requirements regarding the grid in the page http://hepix.caspur.it/afs/hepix.org/project/batch/gridbatchhepixbody.html. The BLAHP issues are the ones where we were not forwarding on the information. BLAHP may not be the only component here though if the CE is not getting the information. Tim Michel Jouvin wrote: > Massimo, > > As you probably know, during last HEPiX meeting last spring, we > devoted 1 1/2 day to this topic with a lot of interesting discussions. > Not sure if there is an official summary of this workshop but at least > most of the talks given are available through the agenda (Thursday and > Friday) : > > <http://iwrwww1.fzk.de/hepix/Agenda.html> > > > Michel > > --On jeudi 8 septembre 2005 12:05 +0200 "Maarten Litmaath, CERN" > > <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> Dear colleagues, >> please let us know what other kinds of job execution requirements for >> the >> batch system should be expressible in the JDL and subsequently forwarded >> to the batch system. >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 11:16:41 +0200 (CEST) >> From: Massimo Sgaravatto - INFN Padova <[log in to unmask]> >> To: Maarten LITMAATH <[log in to unmask]>, >> David Smith <[log in to unmask]>, >> "Charles (Cal) Loomis" <[log in to unmask]> >> Cc: Francesco Prelz <[log in to unmask]>, >> Giuseppe Fiorentino <[log in to unmask]> >> Subject: Forward requirements to local batch system >> >> Dear all >> >> I have just been given the task to try to better undestand the >> requirement: >> >> "Forward requirements to local batch system" >> >> set in the JRA1 workplan (looks like there were some misunderstandings >> concerning who had to take care about that). >> >> >> As far as I am told, the issue was raised in particular by Cal. I think >> that also David and Maarten are the right candidates to start the >> discussion with. >> >> So, could you please elaborate such requirement ? >> >> >> Do you mean that the various constraints expressed in the "JDL >> requirement" expression should be translated in the proper batch system >> directive and used when submitting the job, or were you thinking about >> something different ? >> >> >> How about different batch systems supporting a different set of >> attributes ? >> Should all the supported (by the used batch system) attributes be >> translated, or only a minimum common (supported by all the supported >> batch system) set of attributes should be considered ? >> >> >> How about translating requirement expressions specified on multiple CE >> attributes, as the following example (taken from a real atlas production >> job): >> >> Requirements = other.GlueCEPolicyMaxCPUTime >= ( 14000000 / 60 ) / >> other.GlueHostBenchmarkSI00 ) >> >> ? >> >> Let's start the discussion :-) >> >> Cheers, Massimo > > > > > ************************************************************* > * Michel Jouvin Email : [log in to unmask] * > * LAL / CNRS Tel : +33 1 64468932 * > * B.P. 34 Fax : +33 1 69079404 * > * 91898 Orsay Cedex * > * France * > ************************************************************* -- Tim Bell CERN Div IT/FIO, CH-1211 Geneva 23 Phone: +41 22 76 72370 E-Mail: [log in to unmask] Office: 31 1-008