 |
 |
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 02:54:59AM +0100, Maarten Litmaath, CERN wrote: > On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Kyriakos G. Ginis wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 02:47:10AM +0200, Kyriakos G. Ginis wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 01:38:33AM +0100, Maarten Litmaath, CERN wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > those jobs did not reveal a smoking gun either, so now I have restarted > > > > the proxy renewal daemon in debug mode: can you submit a few more jobs? > > > > Hi Maarten, > > > > These 5 jobs did not abort due to proxy expiration, and are still > > running, so I guess that whatever you did fixed the problem. > > OK, I now undid the change: can you submit 5 more jobs to see if the > problem comes back? I submitted 5 jobs several hours ago and they are still running. https://lxn1188.cern.ch:9000/y_g1jbfZt417-AKRWxikeA https://lxn1188.cern.ch:9000/r9y7L6F728uWxAU_6QIy7Q https://lxn1188.cern.ch:9000/5m8xZ6c5sOWwM_8GdrwHMg https://lxn1188.cern.ch:9000/12WfIpxFlJ3yQCzszLe4uw https://lxn1188.cern.ch:9000/e41ZOv9ixuz3yvTyDAlUCw Perhaps the problem was just a matter of restarting the proxy renewal daemon... -- Kyriakos Ginis, PhD Candidate Software Engineering Laboratory National Technical University of Athens