 |
 |
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 06:27:20PM +0200 or thereabouts, Antun Balaz wrote: > Well, > I don't think this is the case, because after dropping from 200+ to 170+, > number of BDII entries never went back, and now it has decreased again, as > you can see from the graphs > > http://goc.grid.sinica.edu.tw/gstat/AEGIS01-PHY-SCL/BDIINode_Perf_ent_.html This could be people fixing and removing a previous error where every combination of queue and VO (or was it queue and storage area, I forget) was being published. Updated versions of yaim correct the situation. As someone mentioned grab the diff. > > I am just curious: is it some change of configuration which eliminated > auxilary entries, or something else? > > Reagards, Antun > > ----- > E-mail: [log in to unmask] > Web: http://scl.phy.bg.ac.yu/ > > Phone: +381 11 3160260, Ext. 152 > Fax: +381 11 3162190 > > Scientific Computing Laboratory > Institute of Physics, Belgrade > Serbia and Montenegro > ----- > > ---------- Original Message ----------- > From: Valentin Vidic <[log in to unmask]> > To: [log in to unmask] > Sent: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 18:17:25 +0200 > Subject: Re: [LCG-ROLLOUT] Number of BDII entries (again) > > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 04:19:25PM +0200, Antun Balaz wrote: > > > the number of BDII entries on my top-level BDII has dropped again from > 170+ > > > to approx. 155 (20 entries!). The same applies to other BDIIs as well. > > > > Maybe some people switch their clusters off for the weekend. :) > > > > But really, save the output now and than make a diff when it gets > > back to normal. > > > > -- > > Valentin > ------- End of Original Message ------- -- Steve Traylen [log in to unmask] http://www.gridpp.ac.uk/