Print

Print


We've modified the relevant bit of the FDT manual to clarify the  
curvature threshold.  See:
http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fdt/
 From the drop down menu chose probtrack, then go to the options tab  
section.
Heidi

On 11 Oct 2005, at 14:53, Joseph Devlin wrote:

> I haven't had any trouble tracking arcuate fibres using the default  
> curvature threshold (0.2) but if you're worried about it, just set  
> it to something really small like 0.01.
>
> In my own experience, arcuate fibres tend to be on the edge of  
> white matter paths and thus seeds nearest to gray matter are most  
> likely to reveal these. I tend to anatomically mask a region and  
> then selectively choose "gray matter" voxels as the seeds by doing  
> a fast-segmentation, computing the tissue class probabilities,  
> thresholding the grey matter image at 0.2 and binarising it to  
> create a grey matter mask.  If you then mask the original  
> anatomical image with the gray mask, you'll get the voxels with at  
> least 20% chance of being gray matter in your anatomical ROI.  The  
> ones most likely to give good arcuate traces seem to be those  
> closest to the edge, although this is just anecdotal -- I haven't  
> systematically looked at this.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Joe
>
> -----------
> Joseph T. Devlin, Ph. D.
> FMRIB Centre, University of Oxford
> Headley Way, Headington
> Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK
> Phone: +44-(0)1865-222-494
> Fax:    +44-(0)1865-222-494
> Email:  [log in to unmask]
>

Heidi Johansen-Berg
FMRIB Centre
John Radcliffe Hospital
Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
Tel: +44 (0) 1865 222782
Fax: +44 (0) 1865 222717

[log in to unmask]
http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~heidi