I’m with
Our exam board
has tried to ignore issues of dyslexia on the grounds that all adjustments have
been made during the T&L process, and by extra time, use of computers etc
in the exams [whilst retaining the right to discretion on individual cases of
course]
PS my emails to Dis-Forum generate two
automatic responses, one saying the message has been distributed, another
saying it has been rejected. Could I
ask you,
Principal Lecturer in Soil Science / Chair,
Research Committee
Disability Officer
Royal Agricultural College, Cirencester, Glos GL7
6JS
01285 652531 ext 2234 fax 01285 650219
http://www.rac.ac.uk/~john_conway/
[log in to unmask]">email [log in to unmask]
-----Original Message-----
From: Discussion list for disabled
students and their support staff. [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Pollak
Sent: 20 April 2005 09:07
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: identifying the work
of dyslexic students
Mark
Thanks for this idea. I am aware from people's responses in this
forum that it is a pretty complex matter (the whole 'sticker' business). That's
why we're trialling it - to see what people here at DMU think about the very
sorts of point you make. From an internal DMU perspective, I will be glad if
the trials get people thinking about the issues.
My personal view is that there is a tension between having to
respond to legislation which categorises dyslexia as a disability and calls for
'reasonable adjustments' and my own preferred approach, which would be to avoid
labelling students as having 'special needs' or disabilities and adopting truly
inclusive learning and teaching practices. But as it stands, we've got to have
equitable systems which comply with the law.
David
-----Original Message-----
From: Wakeham, Mark
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 19 April 2005 13:36
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: identifying the work
of dyslexic students
Hello David
We have difficulty with this at UWIC because lecturers who mark the
work are continuously saying that they are not qualified to say whether an
error is dyslexia related or not and that it is not as simple as ignoring
spelling and grammar, because if the grammar is confused the sense of what is
being argued can be lost. As a consequence, instead of taking dyslexia into
consideration at the point of marking we are forced to do it at the examination
board stage.
What are your thoughts on this?
Mark Wakeham
Dyslexia Support Tutor
UWIC