 |
 |
Hi Ian Arguably (i.e. in the DRC's opinion but not some SU general managers) SUs were already covered by the DDA in all their activities pre-SENDA because the educational exemption could not cover them. Certainly this would appear to have been the case wherever SUs were constituted independently and not as constituent parts of an HEI. Mick's point would therefore appear to be well-made - SUs ought to be clear about what they have done to make adjustments in all areas of their activities. Then they can be clear about the limitations to students and to the institution in asking for grant monies to allow for extending this work, wherever this funding might actually originate. Paul