We see at the back of the report data capable of identifying a living
individual that is sensitive data. A list of people and convictions.
Will someone tell me how this is not itself a breach of the act?
We also see: "During 2004-05, the Notification department also dealt with
225,257 renewals - almost 16 per cent more than we processed in 2003-04. We
also processed 40,932 new applications (23,000 fewer than the previous
year). The total number of entries on the register (after removals and
clearance of fees) was 259,296 on 31 March 2005 compared to 251,702 a year
earlier.
The figures indicate a shift from new notifications to renewals. However, we
believe that there are still a number of areas where organisations who
should be on the public register have not notified us. During 2005-2006 we
intend to do more work in this area."
Now that is vastly understated, isn't it?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
available to the world wide web community at large at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at : -
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
Any queries about sending or receiving message please send to the list owner
[log in to unmask]
(all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
