On 13 Jan 2005 at 03:47 PST, Keith Refson wrote: > > Anthony Stone wrote: >> I have a program in which I use the structure >> >> go to (101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110), index >> 110 stuff >> ... >> 109 more stuff >> ... >> 108 and so on >> ... >> ... >> >> >> The computed GOTO used here is an obsolescent feature, but there >> doesn't seem to be an obvious replacement. A CASE construct isn't >> suitable, because there is no jump out at the end of each block -- > > If your problem is sufficiently regular, how about something along these lines > > do i=index,1,-1 > select case(i) > case (10) > .. stuff > case (9) > ... more stuff > ... > end select > end do > > Keith Refson Sorry, Keith, when I posted my response I hadn't registered yours. Mine was a duplication. As I said before, this adds 3 more lines to the original code length and is very clear. You needn't have qualified your suggestion, though. I don't think there is any extra requirement for the code to be regular. Anthony clearly stated that the situation was a fall-through, and this DO loop form satisfies that just fine. Ted -- Ted Stern Applications Group Cray Inc. office: 206-701-2182 411 First Avenue South, Suite 600 cell: 206-383-1049 Seattle, WA 98104-2860 FAX: 206-701-2500 Frango ut patefaciam -- I break that I may reveal (The Paleontological Society motto, equally apropos for debugging)