 |
 |
It was originally published as a CVCP note 1/99/91 in May 1999 and this was updated in Universities UK note 1/02/90 in July 2002. This civered how institutions should split the fee if a student attended 2 in the same academic year. It also advised institutions to make it clear to students what the policy was if students withdrew before December 1st. The advice, approved by the DfES, was that any charge should be on a pro-rata basis for the time actually attended. Regards David Jane Richards wrote: > The only guideleines I can recall/ am aware of were published by > Universities UK in 2000/2001 and suggested charging on a pro rata basis > for an academic year over 30 weeks for undergraduate students. > Unfortunately I cannot find a copy of the document, > Jane > Jane Richards MICM(Grad) > Income Section Manager > University of Newcastle Upon Tyne > 0191 222 6516 > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Admin-student [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On >>Behalf Of Toby Best >>Sent: 09 February 2005 14:05 >>To: [log in to unmask] >>Subject: Good Practice - Fee Refunds >> >> >>I believe that there are some good practice guidelines in >>existence relating to tuition fee refund policies for students >>who withdraw from >>their course prior to their expected end date. I think that these may >>have been published by the dfes but have been unable to locate them. >> >>Is anyone aware of such guidelines? >> >>Toby R Best >>Assistant Academic Registrar >>Registry Services >>The Surrey Institute of Art & Design, University College >> >>Tel. 01252 892605 >> Fax 01252 892624 >>[log in to unmask] >> >> >>The views expressed in this email are those of the author and >>not necessarily those of the Surrey Institute. This message >>may contain confidential information and will be protected by >>copyright. If you receive it in error please notify us, >>delete it and do not make use of it, or copy it. Any reply may >>be read by the recipient to whom you send it and others within >>the Surrey Institute. >> >>Although we aim to use efficient virus checking procedures the >>Surrey Institute accepts no liability for viruses and >>recipients should use their own virus checking procedures. >> > > >