 |
 |
Hi Roger, My original choice in the snap was between seduction and sedition. And they can become quite close. I didn't really want to labour this at all, but a conversation with a media guy about what to lead out with yesterday in media clips (it was a *joke*, by the way): http://www.smh.com.au/news/science/why-arty-types-crave- lust/2005/11/29/1133026469696.html http://www.smh.com.au/news/arts/alert-and-alarmed-art-under- fire/2005/11/28/1133026405834.html So, yes, a snap of here at the mo'. J > You want to discuss sedimentation rather than seduction? My vote goes > for seduction... > > On 11/30/05, Patrick Mc Manus <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > Jill Lovely but what about sedigitation or even sedimentation to amplify > the > > snappo > > Luv P frozen P > > > > -----Original Message----- > > to discuss > > seduction, rather than > > sedition