 |
 |
Relevancy is not a morality issue -- it's pure courtesy. These posts go to 230 people; irrelevant posts weaken a forum and cause people to sign off or filter its messages directly to the bin. T Kirkham, Andy (DSD) wrote: > Aah the moral high ground, we've finally found it. Are we talking about > archaeology now, is that the relevant subject? (assuming we all know what it > means). Look when I'm too busy or not in the mood for forum babble I just > don't read the e-mails, an option which we all have I hope. Don't make me > handle my dictionary again to define forum for you, it's had enough > punishment already this week! Perhaps the forum mails should come with a > relevancy warning, after all there has always been a wide range of subject > matter. Is this viable or even relevant? I can already feel the communal > hand reaching to cover my mouth, so if anyone reading this really finds it > pointless or obnoxious just don't respond. Like a child I'll soon get bored > (then I'll have to go back to e-mailing "Wake up with Wogan". > Cheers - Andrew > > -----Original Message----- > From: Issues related to Sites & Monuments Records > [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Alexander, Magnus > Sent: 09 December 2004 09:18 > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: Watching Briefs - A Useful Form of Archaeological > Mitigation? > > > RELEVANT discussion. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Issues related to Sites & Monuments Records > [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Kirkham, Andy (DSD) > Sent: 09 December 2004 09:09 > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: Watching Briefs - A Useful Form of Archaeological > Mitigation? > > > So what is a forum for anyway? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Issues related to Sites & Monuments Records > [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Alexander, Magnus > Sent: 08 December 2004 14:18 > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: Watching Briefs - A Useful Form of Archaeological > Mitigation? > > > Thank christ for the voice of reason. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Issues related to Sites & Monuments Records > [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Tyler Bell > Sent: 08 December 2004 14:10 > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: Watching Briefs - A Useful Form of Archaeological > Mitigation? > > > Back in my day, a 'Drott' was used to refer to a discussion thread that > should have died several posts back... > > :) > Disclaimer > > This e-mail (including any attachments) is only for the person or > organisation it is addressed to. If you are not the intended recipient you > must let me know immediately and then delete this e-mail. If you use this > e-mail without permission, or if you allow anyone else to see, copy or > distribute the e-mail, or if you do, or don't do something because you have > read this e-mail, you may be breaking the law. > > Liability cannot be accepted for any loss or damage arising from this e-mail > (or any attachments) or from incompatible scripts or any virus transmitted. > > E-mails and attachments sent and received from and by staff and elected > Members may be monitored and read and the right is reserved to reject or > return or delete any which are considered to be inappropriate or unsuitable. > Disclaimer > > This e-mail (including any attachments) is only for the person or organisation it is addressed to. If you are not the intended recipient you must let me know immediately and then delete this e-mail. If you use this e-mail without permission, or if you allow anyone else to see, copy or distribute the e-mail, or if you do, or don't do something because you have read this e-mail, you may be breaking the law. > > Liability cannot be accepted for any loss or damage arising from this e-mail (or any attachments) or from incompatible scripts or any virus transmitted. > > E-mails and attachments sent and received from and by staff and elected Members may be monitored and read and the right is reserved to reject or return or delete any which are considered to be inappropriate or unsuitable.