Print

Print


Norman,

It also fails on updating a system from the last release. I will have to
think of a way around this, but I defiantly need a fixed makefile for the
current and previous release versions of AUTOASTROM.

Steve.

-----Original Message-----
From: Starlink development [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Norman Gray
Sent: 18 June 2004 12:53
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: USSC219 rc2

Peter and Steve,

On 2004 Jun 18 , at 12.03, Peter W. Draper wrote:

> thought I'd try to install this one as a complete update of rc1, rather
> than a fresh install. This fails when cleaning the deinstalled
> AUTOASTROM.
> See the attached log.

Blast -- the Curse of the Autoastrom Makefile strikes again.  These
crop up because the autoastrom makefile is a horrible, horrible, mess,
since it tries to configure and build (and install, deinstall and
clean) astrom, catlib and match all at the same time, and in an
unprincipled way.  This is not the first time Steve has had trouble
with it (contra Steve, I don't remember seeing this particular error
before, but I've possibly just erased the memory).

A fix is problematic since I started moving autoastrom and astrom to
the Starlink repository a couple of months ago (at last! -- now it will
make sense, and not be quite so fragile).  They're mostly done, but
catlib isn't, because it threw up some problems which are probably
common in thirdparty applications.  And packaging will be a puzzle,
sigh.

I have to resolve those before the CVS week, but the upshot is that
this isn't distributable from the RAL repository, and to avoid
(otherwise inevitable) confusion I removed autoastrom from my local
repository.  I can get the repository back of course, but I'd really
rather not, since it would be pretty expensive in time.  Thus if I fix
this, I'll just do so by unpacking the distribution tarball and hacking
away at the makefile within it (I think I've spotted where the problem
is).

That is, do you (youse) think we can just leave this error, if
everything else works?  It's only a clean target, and while I'd rather
it didn't happen, I doubt many folk would even notice.

See you,

Norman


--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Norman Gray  /  Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, UK
http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/norman/