medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and culture
At 10:29 AM 6/16/2004 -0500, you wrote:
medieval-religion: Scholarly
discussions of medieval religion and culture
Quite frankly I find the tone and content here offensive. The
Vatican
conference presumably involved scholars working along the same lines
as
those who have produced a body of revisionist studies on the
various
inquisitions (Peters, Kamen, Tedeschi and others) over the last
three
decades. The revisionism was long overdue because of the distorted
and
exaggerated view of the inquisitions that had become conventional in
the
18th and 19th centuries and is now endemic in popular culture.
WIthout
having seen the papers, why mock the conference or its proceedings?
If
a conference convoked by one of our professional societies or one of
our
major universities had announced the publication of its proceedings
with
similar generalizations, would you not at least have reserved
judgment
until you had seen the volume? And what does contemporary
geopolitics
(and ecclesial-politics) have to do with any of this? The joke
works
only if one asumes that everyone on the list shares the same
geopolitical assumptions.
i think the point of the joking is that the results of the investigation
are so painfully self-defensive, all aimed at "correcting" a
widespread "popular idea" of the inquisition that, because it's
so bad, can serve as a foil for the church to say, "we weren't
that bad.".
what i think i personally wd have been much more comfortable with was a
discussion of how, whatever the numbers of executed, they represent only
the tip of the iceberg of a form of pervasive intimidation that injected
whole new levels of mutual distrust and (justified) paranoia into
european society, and violated (and corrupted) basic principles of
Christian love and generosity. And that this is something that is
inexcusable and well worth meditating on so that it doesn't happen again.
Instead we get an allegedly scholarly conference of bean counters whose
conclusions look suspiciously like the shabbiest kind of "damage
control."
The inquisition has a bad reputation for good reason: it defies every
aspect of our modern culture -- the one in which we get to write our free
opinions in public. If the church wants to be part of the modern
world, i.e., civil society (apparently a real matter of debate), then it
needs to do real self-criticism. Until then, i don't think you can
expect many independent scholars (precisely thekind of people the
inquisition sought to silence) to treat this kind of stuff as anything
more than a bad joke.
r
**********************************************************************
To join the list, send the message: join medieval-religion YOUR NAME
to: [log in to unmask]
To send a message to the list, address it to:
[log in to unmask]
To leave the list, send the message: leave medieval-religion
to: [log in to unmask]
In order to report problems or to contact the list's owners, write to:
[log in to unmask]
For further information, visit our web site:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/medieval-religion.html