On 17 May 2004 Mark Taylor wrote: > plus a couple of tweaks in the build.xml files for those packages. > It's probably just an oversight that they're not in the release branch, It's an oversight, yes, but I don't know who was doing the overseeing, so to speak. :-) > Brad: (a) do you know any reason why these can't be released? They should be good to go, yes. But... > (b) is the JNIAST one built against AST V3.2-11, and if not, > can you come up with a version that is? I'm not really sure. The most recent built version of AST I have is 2.0-11, which is clearly much too old. I'll build the most recent version of AST I can get my hands on, then rebuild JNIAST. JNIHDS should be good to go, as I believe HDS isn't prone to frequent change like AST is. Brad.