> > > Correct, and I think this could be made explicit in the AM. > > > > > > His example is still correct, I think. > > > > Isn't rdfs:label supposed to provide "a human-readable version of a resource's name" and has range rdfs:Literal? > > It *is* a Literal. Look again. Sorry: i missed the quotation marks. Nevertheless the object is not what one would expect as label for a resource, which is denoted by a URI. rs