Print

Print


> > > Correct, and I think this could be made explicit in the AM.
> > >
> > > His example is still correct, I think.
> >
> > Isn't rdfs:label supposed to provide "a human-readable version of a resource's name" and has range rdfs:Literal?
>
> It *is* a Literal. Look again.

Sorry: i missed the quotation marks.


Nevertheless the object is not what one would expect as label for
a resource, which is denoted by a URI.


rs