Dear Baldo - This
looks ot me like a fantastically intersting idea. People have tried to
use syntactic ideas before in this kind of context (inclduing David
Can ter many years ago), though not, I thiknk, in quite the way you
are proposing to do it. Others wioll come up with references,
I'm sure.
But to me the
idea of the grid seems not only to be the limiting form to which
urban space in general is directed, but also basic to how we cognise
large scale spatial complexes. It seems so fundamental to our notions
of the two dimensional space in which we move that in rasher moments,
I've sometimes wondered if it might have some bearing on brain
structure and functioning. Anyway, the papers listed below all have
some bearing on the grid. - Bill
1999 The hidden
geometry of deformed grids: or, why space syntax works, when it looks
as though it shouldn't Environment and Planning B: Planning &
Design Vol 26, 169-191 Theme Issue on Space Syntax
Symposium.
2000 Centrality
as a process: accounting for attraction inequalities in deformed
grids Urban Design International, 3/4, 107-127
Hillier B
(2002a) A theory of the city as object: how the social
construction of urban space is mediated by spatial laws
Urban Design International Vol 7, 3-4 26 pp. ISSN 1357
5317
Hillier B
(2002a) A theory of the city as object: how the social
construction of urban space is mediated by spatial laws
Urban Design International Vol 7, 3-4 26 pp. ISSN 1357 5317 Also
published on web version of Proceedings at
http://undertow.arch.gatech.edu/homepages/3sss/
Hillier B
(2003a) The architectures of seeing and going
Proceedings of the Fourth Space Synyax Symposium, London, June 2003.
ISBN 9535456-1-X www.spacesyntax.org/
Hi everyone,
I have been trying to do a parallel between space syntax techniques
and current
information retrieval techniques in order to build a navigable urban
grid of
the whole web or at least of a portion of it. There are various
motivations to
do this. In a link-based model, as the web is organized, there is very
little
sense of place because the users don't have a view of where they
are.
Following link to link, users can get quickly lost, and when there is
an
underlying organization (usually local to the website) to help them,
it tends
to be a hierarchy which has to be painfully learned. Also, browsing is
slow
because you only make use of your cognitive abilities (not your
perceptual
abilities) to figure out where to go. Within a particular page
there are many
links where you can go next and when you go to the next page you have
this very
narrow view of where you came from or where you are going.
With a spatial organization, and in particular with a grid layout, I
hope to
overcome some of these limitations. In my view, the user would
move down
corridors (streets?) where web pages would be tiled next to each other
in
either side of the walls of the corridor. Corridors would
connect to other
corridors and presumably there would be enough navigational signs
analogous to
street signs in cities. The placement of the web pages in the
corridors would
be such that if you look at all the trails that people take in the
web, pages
near each other in the grid would be, on average, close to each other
in the
trails.
An implicit assumption with this view is that web pages are locations,
yet a
lot of web pages would not be considered locations but more
navigational pages.
Consider for example, the pages of the open directory, dmoz.
There, most of
the pages are really there for navigation and to access other web
pages. So, I
would have to make the distinction between web pages that can be
considered as
locations or destinations and those that are navigational and
these
navigational pages can be candidates for streets (the corridors).
There are
also groups of web pages (web sites really) linked to each other that
attract
users with similar life styles and these users could be considered a
community
around them. In a form analogous to
(some) real life streets, we should be
placing together all these pages in the same street so that you get
synergy
between each other and support its corresponding community.
Assuming we have an "intelligible" grid layout, the user
should be able to move
quickly through the corridors and also make use of his/her perceptual
abilities
to look for information. Also, (again depends on a good layout),
remembering
locations (pages) and learning a mental map becomes possible, making
use of our
abilities to navigate in our (physical) urban spaces. This
organization might
even afford a real-time sense of place in much the same way as streets
do in
that if the browsers (users) would see each other, presumably it would
increase
the chances for interacting with each other in a meaningful context.
This
representation, of course, would be as a complement on the current web
rather
than as a replacement and not every web page would have to be
accounted for.
What I am working on is a way to use the latent information on the
topology of
the web to figure out a good mapping for a grid layout of all or a
partial set
of web pages. If you consider how google works, they take the
link information
within web pages and out of this link topology they can effectively
figure out
which web pages would have the highest traffic. Actually this is
not quite
correct because they really calculate an authority measure (its
pagerank), but
there are some alternative techniques that do predict the traffic
flow, though
both measures are calculated with a similar effort.
When you do a search, they first figure out which pages have the
keywords you
put in (again this is a bit simplified) and then they rank them using
their
corresponding (global) pagerank. The pagerank measures, on
average, the
proportion of random surfers (i.e., start from a random page, and then
select
one of the outlinks from the page in a random fashion) that you might
find, at
any one time, in a page. In addition, out of the pagerank
calculation, you can
also derive an inverse distance measure between web pages (i.e.,
higher values
correspond to pages close by in the link topology and close by means
that if
you consider all the web trails, then they would be close to each
other in the
web trails that contain them).
In order to build the grid, I was making some parallels between web
pages and
locations in a grid. A natural parallel might be that high
pagerank pages that
also work like hubs (they point to many other pages), would correspond
to high
integration streets or lines in the grid (using the space syntax
meaning of
integration). Presumably, they have to be long lines and be
shallow in terms
of accessibility. As explained above, I have to decide when to
place a page in
a street and when to make it one. I probably have to make sure
that the grid
is itself intelligible (using again the space syntax meaning). I
guess I was
thinking that a good grid layout would be such that if you do a space
syntax
analysis, I should find that some measures (integration, visibility,
?) would
correlate well with their corresponding pagerank scores in that
implicitly they
might be measuring similar behaviors.
I was hoping that people in this list might provide me with pointers
to space
syntax literature I should look at and of issues that I should be
aware of.
Some of the mappings that I don't know how to think of is when to
decide to
link streets together and how to think of some of the ideas of the
super grid
(that is, different levels of traffic in a grid). I am assuming
that the
psychological principles behind the navigation in a physical urban
grid would
be similar to this generated grid and they should transfer over.
I guess from
the limited knowledge of the space syntax techniques that I have, I
haven't
found much in terms of generative principles.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Baldo