Hi
Staff exposed to animals
are identified on their
pre-employment health form (PEHQ). The first page of this requires the recruiting
manager to identify any hazards associated with the intended post inc. work
with animals or hazardous chemicals. (the form is then
given to the employee who returns it in confidence to OH)
When we received their PEHQ we send them
an appt for baseline spirometry (and imms if reqd). This is repeated
at 6 and 12 weeks post recruitment as per HSE guidelines.
Thereafter the employee and all existing
staff have lung function tests annually. As part of the lung function test a
respiratory questionnaire is always completed (usually with much grumbling) by
the employees.
If I have a concern about an employee at
recruitment I would not pas them as ' fit' but refer them to our OH
consultant-having first assessed their workplace and done spirometry.
If I have concerns about existing staff either
because of symptoms or 'abnormal' spirometry, I often
do a workplace visit but usually repeat the spirometry and them
refer them to the OHPhysician. In the meantime I have usually placed restrictions
on their level and frequency of exposure and also advised about RPE/PPE. (This advice
is always given in writing and copied with the employees consent to the local
H&S person and the line manager) In some cases this is getting them to wear
it for the first time (!) or increasing the level of protection i.e. going from
face mask to air fed respirator. In some cases I have withdrawn staff from all animal
contact pending advice from the OHP. OHP refers onto specialists. In all cases
so far the OHP has endorsed my advice and restrictions. Staff
who have been seen by the OHP are followed up by me in the workplace on a regular
basis to ensure that restrictions and RPE etc are in place but also to make
sure symptoms aren't reoccurring or worsening.
Would not report as RIDDOR until diagnosis
or occupational asthma confirmed by OH consultant or other specialist.
Spirometry results that are slightly outside
normal parameters but not associated with symptoms are discussed with the OHP
(with employees agreement) and any further follow up
or referral to see the doctor made then.
My experience is (and im sure this is not uncommon)
that employees can have quite marked symptoms for years and still show no change
in lung function, hence my insistence on annual questionnaires. Hope this is of
some help.
-----Original Message-----
From: diane romano woodward
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004
2:48 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Occ asthma -practical
practice
Dear All,
I am sitting on a working party
reviewing the evidence for detection ,health surveillance, treatment etc
for Occupational Asthma. We hope to issue guidelines in September this year.
Meanwhile I would like to get a
flavour of what people are actually doing out there. If your employees are
exposed to Sensitisers can you give me some idea ,and also indicate why you
have chosen to follow this particular path:
Any information on your
attitudes/practice to:
Pre employment issues
Health surveillance :baseline /early
/ annual?
paper screen , spirometry or both?
Action on finding a suspected case-
removal from exposure,serial peak flow, referral to specialist?
RIDDOR reporting?
Does your practice differ with the
different sensitisers, e.g. animal exposure and chemical?
I will be having a good input into
the leaflets that are produced for OH professionals, and GP and
practice nurses.So I would like to know what you would feel it would be
valuable to have in them...
Best wishes,
Diane