 |
 |
well said - there is a hierarchy of prevention - control the dust and aerosol exposures first - Kate >>> [log in to unmask] 12/02/04 12:56:37 >>> At the risk of being controversial, herewith my immediate thoughts. Lung function testing sounds like shutting the stable door after the rapid departure of the horse! Has the company concerned actually done a full risk assessment and, if so, what hazards and associated risks did they detect? If there were significant risks, what has been done to adequately control these? Lung function testing will only show you if they have got it wrong, and after the event. If they did not detect any risks, then why do lung function testing? The only argument I can think of is that this might indicate an exposure and consequent effect that had not been detected. (On that basis should we not be doing lung function testing for everyone. After all, who knows what we might be exposed to!) Regards Chris Packham ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sue Summers-Coles" <[log in to unmask]> To: <[log in to unmask]> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 12:23 PM Subject: More poultry queries > Hi All > > One of my H&S colleagues recommended lung function testing to a poultry > producing client and was told that no-one they know of in the industry > actually has this surveillance for their employees- I beg to differ but > need some concrete information i.e. company names if possible to back up > our response. > > Regards > Sue > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > > IMPORTANT > The information contained in this e-mail and in any > attachments is intended only for the named recipient or > entity. The e-mail and any attachments may contain legally > privileged or confidential information and may not be > disclosed to anyone else. If you are not the intended > recipient, please notify us immediately on 01789-202121 > and delete the material from any computer that may contain > it and destroy any printed copies you may have made. We > accept no liability for any direct, indirect or > consequential loss or damage arising from any action taken > in reliance on or use of the information contained in this > e-mail and give no warranty or representation as to its > accuracy or reliability. > > NFU Mutual has the facility to monitor and read both > incoming and outgoing communications by e-mail and these > may be intercepted by its automated e-mail administrators. > NFU Mutual will not accept e-mail communications found to > contain viruses. > > Parent Company: The National Farmers Union Mutual Insurance > Society Ltd > (No. 111982). Authorised and regulated by the Financial > Services Authority for Life, Pension and Investment business. > Registered in England > Registered office : Tiddington Road, Stratford-upon-Avon, > CV37 7BJ. > Tel: 01789 204211 > NFU Mutual is a member of the General Insurance Standards > Council, ABI and FOS. > > > http://www.nfumutual.co.uk > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Please remove this footer before replying. > Visit http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html for list archives > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Please remove this footer before replying. Visit http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html for list archives ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Please remove this footer before replying. Visit http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html for list archives