OK. Fair enough. But what is the position where in the course of debate on
this list, someone makes reference (as if referencing in an academic
paper) to an article. Where are we with regard to that?
Or is this whole issue getting a little too pedantic?
With kind regards,
James Beresford
Occupational Health Advisor
Robert Dunn
<[log in to unmask]>
12/05/2004 11:06
Please respond to Occupational Health mailing list
To: [log in to unmask]
cc:
Subject: Re: Proper Use of This List (copying of papers)
Dear List,
Just to try and clarify the copyright issue that Greta raised, I have
attached a copy of the Licensed Copying User Guidelines that we here at
the
University of Oxford are expected to adhere to....
Regards, Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Trevor Ogden" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 10:11 AM
Subject: Re: Proper Use of This List (copying of papers)
> At 19:09 11/05/2004, you wrote:
>
> >Greta has raised an interesting point re copyright. I suspect that
> >academic libraries may have a special license to send just one copy to
a
> >recipient.
>
> I have an interest in this as a journal editor, but by no means an
expert
> on copyright. I doubt whether any such licence exists (but are there
any
> librarians on the list?), but the idea of 'fair dealing' is important.
If
> a library subscribes to a journal (or if you do personally) then the
> publisher has had some payment, and in practice will not object to
single
> copies of small parts of the journal for use by staff, even though
making
a
> copy is a breach of copyright. Making a copy to supply to someone else
who
> might otherwise have to subscribe, or pay a fee to get a copy, is
probably
> different. After all, the journal does cost money to produce.
>
> Everything in this field is being transformed rapidly by the on-line
> publishing revolution. With my own journal, a researcher might find a
> paper we have published from the contents list or by a Google search,
and
> if they want a copy of that single paper, they can then download one
from
> our website for $23. This kind of arrangement is widespread for
academic
> journals, and in due course may largely replace subscriptions, but I
think
> that Occupational Health Review (the subject of the original enquiry)
does
> not yet have an on-line edition.
>
> Trevor
>
>
> (Dr) Trevor Ogden
> Editor in Chief, Annals of Occupational Hygiene
> http://annhyg.oupjournals.org/
> [log in to unmask] or [log in to unmask]
> North American Editor: Professor Stephen Rappaport,
[log in to unmask]
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Please remove this footer before replying.
> Visit http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html for list archives
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Please remove this footer before replying.
Visit http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html for list archives
