 |
 |
Yes but its absence, if the post advertised else where, needs to be well known enough with all agencies who advertise posts, that the absence means 'NOT APPROVED' OR 'not fit for human consumption' F -----Original Message----- From: Chartered Library and Information Professionals [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Chris Armstrong Sent: 28 October 2004 10:00 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: Membership fees, benchmarking and bad pay Frances Hendrix wrote: > On the question of NOT advertising. Perhaps if Cilip introduced a sort > of Kite mark, where an ad without it was seen as being suspect in some > sort of sense? I like the Kite mark idea - perhaps it could be very explicit: "This post is advertised at below the recommended rate" "This post is advertised at or above the recommended rate" Chris Armstrong National Councillor