 |
 |
Given that moving to rolling subscriptions is, I suspect, not remotely controversial, I find it odd that the two motions we are to be asked to consider are "all or nothing". Too late now, I guess, but was the option of keeping banding but moving to rolling renewal dates considered? (Is there anything theoretically impossible about running banded subscriptions on a rolling basis and asking members to notify CILIP of changes to their bands?). I feel stitched up, to be honest. Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: Chartered Library and Information Professionals > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Tim Buckley Owen > Sent: 25 October 2004 11:37 > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: CILIP AGM- subs > > > Dear LIS-CILIP members, > snip > > > Option 2 was prepared by the Honorary Treasurer in advance of > the AGM as a contingency measure to ensure adequate > membership income for CILIP in 2005 in the event of Option 1 > being rejected. It proposes a continuation of the existing > income-related system with a 3% inflation increase on current > subscription levels.