 |
 |
Very interesting, but is it based in part on a false premise? Grants for research projects do not normally provide support for the time and effort required, after the completion of the investigation and the project report, to take the results of research and re-write them in a more readily assimilated fashion for publication in a journal article. In Britain, this has been exacerbated by the withdrawal of research support funding from all those University Departments which are not able to demonstrate overall excellence at international level. This possibly disregards the existence within other Departments of individuals of international standing, and certainly ignores Departments that make a sound research contribution at a level of excellence that is recognised nationally. It thus means that the individuals carrying out some publicly funded research are in institutions where there is (little support during the research project,) no continuing support after the project finishes, and no time allowed for writing papers for journals as part of their workload. (It also, incidentally, deprives their institutions' libraries of the funds that might be used to purchase journals to support further research.) Because the effort of writing papers is often being undertaken by individuals in their own time, is it then the case that, in effect, the funding agencies (and government) have 'purchased' only limited rights to control the publication of papers derived from research that they may have funded? If so, how are the individuals or institutions to be compensated for the work in preparing papers for open access archives? Or are these archives to hold only less easily digested project reports? -----Original Message----- From: Chartered Library and Information Professionals [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Prof Bruce Royan Sent: 04 February 2004 16:39 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: FW: OECD Committee for Scientific & Technological Policy: Declaration on Access to Research Data from Public Funding Part of the Final Communique of the Meeting of the OECD Ministerial Committee for Scientific and Technological Policy (29-30 January 2004) is the following declaration, which underlines points I suggested should be in CILIP's submission to Select Committee Inquiry into Scientific Publication *%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%**%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%* Prof B Royan www.concurrentcomputing.co.uk Concurrent Computing Ltd, 41 Greenhill Gardens Edinburgh, EH10 4BL United Kingdom +44 1314 4731 51 +44 77 1374 4731 *%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%**%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%* -----Original Message----- DECLARATION ON ACCESS TO RESEARCH DATA FROM PUBLIC FUNDING adopted on 30 January 2004 in Paris The governments of Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, China, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, the Russian Federation, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and the United States o Recognising that an optimum international exchange of data, information and knowledge contributes decisively to the advancement of scientific research and innovation; o Recognising that open access to, and unrestricted use of, data promotes scientific progress and facilitates the training of researchers; o Recognising that open access will maximise the value derived from public investments in data collection efforts; o Recognising that the substantial increase in computing capacity enables vast quantities of digital research data from public funding to be put to use for multiple research purposes by many research institutes of the global science system, thereby substantially increasing the scope and scale of research; o Recognising the substantial benefits that science, the economy and society at large could gain from the opportunities that expanded use of digital data resources have to offer, and recognising the risk that undue restrictions on access to and use of research data from public funding could diminish the quality and efficiency of scientific research and innovation; o Recognising that optimum availability of research data from public funding for developing countries will enhance their participation in the global science system, thereby contributing to their social and economic development; o Recognising that the disclosure of research data from public funding may be constrained by domestic law on national security, the protection of privacy of citizens and the protection of intellectual property rights and trade secrets that may require additional safeguards; o Recognising that on some of the aspects of the accessibility of research data from public funding, additional measures have been taken or will be introduced in OECD countries and that disparities in national regulations could hamper the optimum use of publicly funded data on the national and international scales; o Considering the beneficial impact of the establishment of OECD Guidelines on the Protection of Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Data (1980, 1985 and 1998) and the OECD Guidelines for the Security of Information Systems and Networks (1992, 1997 and 2002) on international policies for access to digital data; DECLARE THEIR COMMITMENT TO: * Work towards the establishment of access regimes for digital research data from public funding in accordance with the following objectives and principles: o Openness: balancing the interests of open access to data to increase the quality and efficiency of research and innovation with the need for restriction of access in some instances to protect social, scientific and economic interests. o Transparency: making information on data-producing organisations, documentation on the data they produce and specifications of conditions attached to the use of these data, available and accessible internationally. o Legal conformity: paying due attention, in the design of access regimes for digital research data, to national legal requirements concerning national security, privacy and trade secrets. o Formal responsibility: promoting explicit, formal institutional rules on the responsibilities of the various parties involved in data-related activities pertaining to authorship, producer credits, ownership, usage restrictions, financial arrangements, ethical rules, licensing terms, and liability. o Professionalism: building institutional rules for the management of digital research data based on the relevant professional standards and values embodied in the codes of conduct of the scientific communities involved. o Protection of intellectual property: describing ways to obtain open access under the different legal regimes of copyright or other intellectual property law applicable to databases as well as trade secrets. o Interoperability: paying due attention to the relevant international standard requirements for use in multiple ways, in co-operation with other international organisations. o Quality and security: describing good practices for methods, techniques and instruments employed in the collection, dissemination and accessible archiving of data to enable quality control by peer review and other means of safeguarding authenticity, originality, integrity, security and establishing liability. o Efficiency: promoting further cost effectiveness within the global science system by describing good practices in data management and specialised support services. o Accountability: evaluating the performance of data access regimes to maximise the support for open access among the scientific community and society at large. * Seek transparency in regulations and policies related to information, computer and communications services affecting international flows of data for research, and reducing unnecessary barriers to the international exchange of these data; * Take the necessary steps to strengthen existing instruments and - where appropriate - create within the framework of international and national law, new mechanisms and practices supporting international collaboration in access to digital research data; * Support OECD initiatives to promote the development and harmonisation of approaches by governments adhering to this Declaration aimed at maximising the accessibility of digital research data; * Consider the possible implications for other countries, including developing countries and economies in transition, when dealing with issues of access to digital research data. INVITE THE OECD: To develop a set of OECD guidelines based on commonly agreed principles to facilitate optimal cost-effective access to digital research data from public funding, to be endorsed by the OECD Council at a later stage. *************************** The Full communique <http://www.oecd.org/document/0,2340,en_2649_34487_25998799_1_1_1_1,00.h tml> is available from the OECD's website www.oecd.org. ****************************