I seem to recall a quote that seems appropriate here:

  "You don't have to blow out another's candle to make your's shine bright"

fortranstatement.com>we propose that FORTRAN be retired, allowing its successor(s) to fortranstatement.com>evolve in the absence of the legacy FORTRAN juggernaut.

Jing Guo wrote:

A friend of mine pointed me to the following website:

"PETITION TO RETIRE FORTRAN"

http://www.fortranstatement.com

Being a long time Fortran developer for scientific computing, I
think those statements make a lot of sense, although I am not
sure I will sign the petition.

I wonder what people on this list think about those statements.

--
** Any opinion expressed is my own and not that of NASA. **
________________________________ _-__-_-_ _-___--- _____________________
Jing Guo, [log in to unmask], (301)614-6172(o), (301)614-6297(fx)
Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, Code 900.3, NASA/GSFC
Greenbelt, MD 20771

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by the Cranfield MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

 
-- 
Dr. Venkat V S S Sastry
Director of Applied Mathematics and Scientific Computing,
Engineering Systems Department,
Cranfield University, RMCS Shrivenham,
Swindon, Wilts, SN6 8LA, UK
Tel: 01793 785315        Fax: 01793 784196
Email: mailto:sastry AT rmcs DOT cranfield DOT ac DOT uk
 
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by the Cranfield MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.