Can anyone help? We've received this request from a
researcher:
I am researching the interpretation of slavery in British heritage.
By this, I mean what is remembered and how it is
presented. I am exploring how different interpretations of the
transatlantic slave trade have different socio-political implications.
My premise is that control of the past is political and that heritage
interpretation is a reflection of the present.
I am finding that in many cases there is an amnesia about it
(ie: World Heritage Nominations of Liverpool and Manchester, as well as
stately homes like Harewood, etc), and where there is acknowledgment (ie:
Liverpool, Hull), it seems to depict a victim/savior promotion of British
abolition which neglects its responsibility. This, I believe,
enables social exclusion to the British identity.
Any feedback, or personal experience surrounding this topic would be
greatly appreciated. I may be reached at
[log in to unmask]. Thank
you.
