I am researching the interpretation of slavery in British heritage.  By this, I mean what is remembered and how it is presented.  I am exploring how different interpretations of the transatlantic slave trade have different socio-political implications.  My premise is that control of the past is political and that heritage interpretation is a reflection of the present.

 

I am finding that in many cases there is an amnesia about it (ie: World Heritage Nominations of Liverpool and Manchester, as well as stately homes like Harewood, etc), and where there is acknowledgment (ie: Liverpool, Hull), it seems to depict a victim/savior promotion of British abolition which neglects its responsibility.  This, I believe, enables social exclusion to the British identity.

 

Any feedback, or personal experience surrounding this topic would be greatly appreciated.  I may be reached at [log in to unmask].  Thank you.