Can anyone help? We've received this request from a researcher: I am researching the interpretation of slavery in British heritage. By this, I mean what is remembered and how it is presented. I am exploring how different interpretations of the transatlantic slave trade have different socio-political implications. My premise is that control of the past is political and that heritage interpretation is a reflection of the present. I am finding that in many cases there is an amnesia about it (ie: World Heritage Nominations of Liverpool and Manchester, as well as stately homes like Harewood, etc), and where there is acknowledgment (ie: Liverpool, Hull), it seems to depict a victim/savior promotion of British abolition which neglects its responsibility. This, I believe, enables social exclusion to the British identity. Any feedback, or personal experience surrounding this topic would be greatly appreciated. I may be reached at [log in to unmask] Thank you.