For the attention of cataloguing managers of art materials. We posted this survey in June 2004, and received some very interesting replies, but am sending again in the hope of receiving more at this time of year. Dear colleagues, Since July 2000 the ARLIS Cataloguing & Classification Committee (ARLIS C&C) has been considering the benefits to UK art libraries of establishing a "UK ArtNACO funnel". A funnel project is essentially "a group of libraries (or cataloguers from various libraries) that have joined together to contribute authority records to the national authority file". An ArtNACO funnel would be concerned with name headings in the art subject area.("Frequently asked questions about funnel projects" available via the link at: http://www.loc.gov/catdir/pcc/naco/funnelfaq.html.) [A note on terminology may be helpful at this point, as UK librarians may know of the existing authority file that we refer to by different names. The current authority file is known as the Anglo-American Authority File (AAAF), the NACO file, the Library of Congress authority files (LCAF) or US Name Authority File (US NAF), and these names have recently been reviewed, see http://www.loc.gov/catdir/pcc/tgauthfile_namerec1.pdf For the purpose of this survey we have used LCAF throughout.] Funnel projects can be regionally based, or focused on one particular subject area. In the subject area of fine art there is already an ArtNACO funnel, but this is based in the United States. The main impetus for considering a UK-based funnel for the subject area of fine art arose from a perception that for many cataloguing in art libraries in Great Britain, the name headings commonly required in bibliographic records were not established in the LCAF. For libraries not participating in NACO (the name authority component of the Program for Cooperative Cataloguing (PCC)), these headings must be established locally. Necessarily, such locally-established headings with their see and see also references cannot be shared by other libraries. ARLIS C&C have discussed how a funnel project could benefit the UK art library community by instigating or increasing the contribution of specialized name entries (series authorities are presently not being considered) to the LCAF. Art cataloguers can thereby have a stronger input into the types and numbers of art-related headings available internationally via the LCAF. As well as contributing headings, they may also via a funnel project revise existing headings in the LCAF. A funnel project may allow smaller cataloguing operations (ranging in size from one to six cataloguers) to input into the LCAF when individually they would not have had the volume of records or regular flow of authority record creation to sustain NACO participation. ARLIS C&C would now welcome the initial views of UK art libraries on a UK ArtNACO funnel project. We would be most grateful if as many libraries as possible with an interest in this subject could complete our survey questionnaire and return it to Jacqueline Cooke, Chair, ARLIS C&C via e-mail (e-mail address: [log in to unmask]) by 31st July 2004. Your replies will be treated in confidence. While the benefits and very considerable associated tasks have been, and continue to be, discussed by ARLIS C&C, we are most keen to learn the views of those with first-hand experience of interacting with the LCAF in UK art libraries. If you have any questions relating to the survey, then please contact the ARLIS C&C via the Chair for further information. A plain text version follows. If you would like a Word or PDF format version, please e-mail Jacqueline Cooke at Goldsmiths College Library, [log in to unmask] best wishes, Jacqueline Cooke Assistant Librarian, Arts & Humanities, Goldsmiths College, University of London (Chair, ARLIS Cataloguing & Classification Committee) Survey of UK art libraries to establish need for a UK ArtNACO funnel(Replies to all numbered questions are optional, all information given will be helpful) Contact details: Name and position Library / Institution address 1. Do you presently use name headings from the Library of Congress authority file (LCAF) in your library’s catalogue? IF YOUR ANSWER TO THIS QUESTION IS NO, PLEASE GO TO 6. If your answer to 1. is yes, do you: A. Download headings B. Copy manually C. Upload headings 2. Please comment on the types of name heading you commonly deal with (personal names; corporate body names; names of projects, etc.) 3. Do you find the LCAF has established headings for the names you encounter in bibliographic cataloguing? If not, what types of name headings do you find are lacking? (e.g. identifiable groups of artists, names of contemporary British artists; names of UK art galleries, collectives, projects, etc.) 4. If no US NAF heading is found when cataloguing, do you create a local authority record for the name? If so, is this authority created in a record conforming to the MARC 21 Format for Authority Data? If so, when creating name authorities originally, does you library apply the Library of Congress Rule Interpretations (LCRIs) (i.e., in addition to AACR2 ch. 21-26)? 5. Please provide a rough estimate of the quantity of headings for which no LCAF heading is found and which you would then potentially be channelling via a UK ArtNACO funnel, per annum. 6. If you do not presently derive name headings from the US NAF, do you have any plans to do so? 7. Do you anticipate that your library would be interested in participating in a UK ArtNACO funnel? (Your answer to this question will not be taken to imply any commitment to such a scheme, should one be established) 8. Does your library have access to the OCLC or RLG databases? (These utilities could potentially be used to submit headings). 9. Please provide here any further comments you may wish to make on any other aspects of the proposed UK ArtNACO funnel, or questions that you have