[log in to unmask] wrote: > James Giles wrote: > >> 4. provide a way to write code that doesn't need KIND >> specifiers on literals in the first place. > > Unfortunately, Fortran still allows procedures with implicit interface. > So how does the literal get the right kind to go with the dummy argument? The same way it gets it now: the user is required to insure the match. You response is hardly even worth of notice. -- J. Giles